Case LawHigh Court › Itta/649/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/649/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Hyderabad v. Smt.g.venkata Lakshmi

High Court 08 Nov 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/649/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Hyderabad v. Smt.g.venkata Lakshmi
Date of order
08 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
2005-06, 2003-04
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itta/649/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) Hyderabad v. Smt.g.venkata Lakshmi, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 12 of 2014, this appeal is also dismissed. ___________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. ___________________________ Date: 08-11-20-17.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No. 649 OF 2017 DATED 08 NOVEMBER, 2017 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), … Hyderabad Appellant AND Smt. G.Venkata Lakshmi … Respondent : Counsel for the appellant Sri J.V.Prasad : -- Counsel for the respondent THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:(per Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) The assessee's appeal filed before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – I, Hyderabad, questioning the levying of penalty, under Section 271 (D) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on journal entry, was allowed. The said order was confirmed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad "A" Bench, Hyderabad (for short, 'the Tribunal'), which is assailed in this appeal. 2. The Tribunal relied upon its earlier order in the assessee's own cases for the assessment year 2005-06 in I.T.A.No. 1135/Hyd/2012 dated 09-11-2012 and for the assessment year 2003-04 in I.T.A.No. 394/Hyd/2013. 3. At the hearing, Smt. M.Kiranmayee, learned counsel, representing Sri J.V.Prasad, learned senior standing counsel for Income Tax Department, has placed before us a copy of order dated 31-01-2014 in I.T.T.A.No. 12 of 2014 filed against I.T.A.No. 394/Hyd/2013 for the assessment year 2003-04. By the said order, a Division Bench of this Court confirmed the order of the Tribunal. 4. Inasmuch as the order under the instant appeal is passed based on the previous order of the Tribunal, which was confirmed by the Division Bench in the aforementioned appeal, for the same reasons as contained in the order in I.T.T.A.No. 12 of 2014, this appeal is also dismissed. ___________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. ___________________________ Date: 08-11-20-17. CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J. JSK
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan