In Itta/65/2000 Of Sri Ugamchand Surana v. Asst Commner Of Income Tax Hyd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is therefore dismissed for default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.65 OF 2000
DATED:27.6.2013
Between:
Ugamchand Surana … Appellant
AndThe Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax(Investigation)Circle 5(2), HyderabadAayakar Bhavan, Fateh Maidan RoadBasheerbaghHyderabad … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. NO.65 OF 2000
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
None appears for the appellant. The appeal is therefore dismissed for default. No order as tocosts.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ______________________ G. ROHINI, J 27.6.2013bnr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue