Itta/66/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Income Tax v. A. Ravi Sekhar
High Court
13 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/66/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Income Tax v. A. Ravi Sekhar
Date of order
13 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/66/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Income Tax v. A. Ravi Sekhar, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.[No][ order][ as][ to]costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
%
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
:: AMARAVATI
FRIDAY .THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 66 OF 2019
Appeal under section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, aggrieved by theorders of the Hon’ble Tribunalin I.T.A.No. 1964/Hyd/2017[dated]26-09-2018 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, Bench-B, Hyderabad relating to the assessment year 2010-2011andpreferredagainst the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),KurnoolinITANo.72/CIT(A),Kn;/2013-14 dated 20-03-2015preferred againsttheorder of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Ananthapur inPAN No. AOXPR 4641B dated 28-03-2013.
Between:
Principal Commissioner Income Tax.Kurnool Charge, MVPComplex,D.NO. 43-128-3, Prakash Nagar, Kurnoot-518001.
...Appellant
AND
A. Ravi Sekhar, Prop M/s Kamakshi Transport, D.NO.4-816-1,Ragithotapalem Tadipatri, Anantapur-515411
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri. Y N Vivekananda - Standing[Counsel][ for]
I.T Department
Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Dundu Manmohan
!
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
I.T.T.A. No.66 of 2019
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
The learned counsel for the appellant-Department prays[leave][ of]the Court to withdraw the instant appeal, asit falls[below][ the][ monetary]limits (i.e. Rs.2 Crores) fixed by the Board, vide[Circular][ No.09/2024][ in]F.No.279/Misc./M-74/2024-ITJ, dated 17.09.2024.The[learned][ counsel]for the appellant has alsofiledinto Court a copyof thecertificate,receivedfromtheAssistantCommissionerofIncome-Tax,Circle-1,Kurnool,whichcontainsinstructionsto withdraw the appealfortheaforementioned reason.
2)The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is placedon record.Leave granted.
3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.[No][ order][ as][ to]costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pendingif any,[shall][ stand]SD/- E KAMESWARA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, Bench-B,Hyderabad, TelanganaHyderabad, Telangana
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Kurnool,[Kurnool]DistrictDistrict
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, AnanthapurAnanthapurDistrictAnanthapurDistrict
4. One CC toSri. Y N Vivekananda, Advocate
5. One CC to Sri. Dundu Manmohan, Advocate [OPUC
6. Three CD Copies
stu
ns
HIGH COURT*.' V.-.V'«vpATED:13/12/2024
ORDER
ITTA.No.66 of 2019
ofX0 5 FEB 2025mi5^/<5.-lyCurrent Section^iOfSPATCX*?^
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
f
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.