Itta/670/2017 Of The Prl Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Automatic Data Solutions And Technology
High Court
13 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/670/2017 Of The Prl Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Automatic Data Solutions And Technology
Date of order
13 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/670/2017 Of The Prl Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Automatic Data Solutions And Technology, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
IMONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUN AL APPEAL NO: 670 OF 2017
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act,1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A',]Hyderabad in lTA.No.433/Hydl2015 for assessment [year ]2010-1 1 dated 28.02.2017preferred against the order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax (TransferPricing), Hyderabad PAN No. dated 29.11.2013 [preferred ]against theorder of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1 (l), HyderabadPAN. No.AAACW2655C, daled 28.O1 .201 4.
Between:
The Principal Commissioner Of lncome Tax -1, Hyderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s. Automatic Data Solutions & Technology Services lndia Pvt. Ltd., 6-3-1091lcl1, Fortune 9 Rajbhavan Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad 500082
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA, SC for lT DEPT.
Counsel forthe Respondent: NONE APPEAREDThe Court made the following: ORDER
THE llON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL EIHtj)//\l'lAND
rHE H( IN',BLE MRS. JUSTTCE SUREPALLT N4NpA
|TTA.NO.670 0F 2017
-( [: ] [(Perrhe Hon'ble ][SriJustice ][Uiial ][thuvanl]
Heard Mr. B lrlarasimha Sarma learned Standing Counsel for lncomeTax Department for the appellant.
None appear : for the respondent
Mr. B.Naras nha Sarma, learned Standing Couns,-'l submits on thebasis of written inr tructions dated 07.06.2022 lhal the aprteal filed by theRevenue is require< to be withdrawn as the issue is covered under 'Vivad SeVishwas' scheme.
That being th; position, the related appeal is disrnissrxl on withdrawal.
lnterlocutory \pplications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No orderas to costs.
SD/.I(.SRINIVASA JOIUT REGISTRAR;{.\r:2\\\ ,\ , \ \ . [t ]""SiE:CTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To, . 1The Chairman, tr :ome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Elench 'A"Hvderabad.Hvderabad.
Hvderabad.2. T#"d;tI"'"al [C, ][,mmissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax (Transfer ][Prk:ing), Hyderabad']. iii"'rj"prtv [com ][nissioner ][of lncome Ta1 ][C1rqlel1 ][(1 ][)'-tly'Jerabad']4. o"L-c-it"'sii B. Narasimha [Sarma, ] [for ][l ][T' ][Dept' ][[oPtjc]]q,. Two CD CoPiesb. One Spare [CoPY]sbr.. \o\.x-2. T#"d;tI"'"al [C, ][,mmissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax (Transfer ][Prk:ing), Hyderabad']. iii"'rj"prtv [com ][nissioner ][of lncome Ta1 ][C1rqlel1 ][(1 ][)'-tly'Jerabad']4. o"L-c-it"'sii B. Narasimha [Sarma, ] [for ][l ][T' ][Dept' ][[oPtjc]]q,. Two CD CoPiesb. One Spare [CoPY]sbr.. \o\.x-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 13106lit022
ORDERlTTA.No.670 o 2017
DISMISSING TI{E ITTAAS WITHDRAT [NWITHOUT COI iTSAS WITHDRAT [NWITHOUT COI iTS
u S [ri--]/.[t.][,16])r,.:;/;'rt' .iii:,t! Iiiill1.,1\,' ..\,i{
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.