Itta/68/2002 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. M/S Cheminor Drugs Ltd. Hyd
High Court
05 Aug 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/68/2002 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. M/S Cheminor Drugs Ltd. Hyd
Date of order
05 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
1994-95
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itta/68/2002 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. M/S Cheminor Drugs Ltd. Hyd, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: Following the same, we dismiss the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A.No.68 of 2002
JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy)
The only question that arises for consideration in this appeal isas to whether it is competent for an Assessing Officer to take recourseto Section 143 (1) (a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’),for making provisional assessment, once a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act, proposing to undertake regular assessment, was issued.
The facts in the instant case are not in dispute. After therespondent filed Returns for the Assessment year 1994-95, theAssessing Officer has chosen to issue notice under Section 143 (2) ofthe Act, seeking certain clarifications and explanations. Even whilethat process was on, he proposed to make the provisional assessmentunder Section 143 (1) (a) of the Act. Recently, in I.T.T.A.No.32 of2002, we took the view through order, dated 24.07.2014, that such acourse is not permissible in law.
Following the same, we dismiss the appeal. There shall be noorder as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions filed in this appeal shall also standdisposed of.
______________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J
____________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM,J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.