Itta/69/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax- 1 v. Nagam Dinakar Reddy
High Court
31 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/69/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax- 1 v. Nagam Dinakar Reddy
Date of order
31 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/69/2024 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax- 1 v. Nagam Dinakar Reddy, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
[ [3418 ][]]
oF rN [rHE ][HrGH ][couRlffi$DrffiA?rl$E ]
r u [s ][DAY;r+1i';rsffi ]'l[s"f;['-?{ [P53F* ][" ][*]
PRESENT
THE THE ANDTICE THE
PEALNO[:69][o] [024]
ETAX[TRtB] [ AP]IN[[coM]]
IN[[coM]]260 [of the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act']Tribunal [APPeal under ][Section]lncome [Tax]daled22-12'2021 [on ][the ][file]017,rder [made in ][l'T ][A No ][529/HYd/2]1961 [against ][the O]Bench ['A"]HYderabad [for ][the]pellate [Tribunal' ][HYderabad]ApPealof the [lncome ][Tax ] Assessment [eat ][20][13-14, ][Preferred ][agal][nst][ the ][Order made ][in]No.0032/20'1 [5-16 dated][ 28-12-2016 ][on the ][file of the ][Commissioner of lncome ][Tax']Appeals [12, ][HYderab][ad ][Preferred ][against][ the ][Order made ][in ] No.ADEPNS214E, [dated][ 30-03-2015 on the file][ of ][DePutY ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome]Tax, Central [Circle ][2(4)' ][HYderabad]
"t*"ila",o"l commissioner [of lncome ][Tax-1 ]' [Hyderabad]
...APPellant
AND
Nagam [Dinakar Reddv' ][#23C' ][Hill ][Ridge ][Villas' ][Gachibowli' Hyderabad]
...ResPondent
Ms B Sapna [Reddy, ][Jr ][Standing ][Counsel]Counsel [for ][the APPellant]RepMrJVPrasadsi.'st"ttaing [Counsel ][for ][lncome Tax]
Department
'-'Counsel for the [ResPondent ][: ]
The Court delivered [the ][following ][Judgment ][:]
HON'BLETHEcEKHEANDHON'SRICE J.o
INCOMETRIBAPPEAL No.69ot2o24
NT:
(f'er the Hon'bb the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
Ms. B.lJapna
B.lJapnaReddy, learned Junior StandingCounsel Junior StandingCounsel representingMr. J.V.prasad, learned SeniorStanding Cou:rsel SeniorStanding Cou:rsel forIncome Tax Department for theappellant.appellant.
2. Learned .lunior Stalding Counsel for the appeJlaltseeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal in the lightof the Circular No.09/2024, d,ated 12.Og.2O24, with theliberty to revive the same in case the subject matter of theappeal falls in any of the exceptions provided in theCircular No.S 12024 dated 15.03.2024.
'JAccordingllr, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in
terms of the liberty [as ]PraYed [for]
/
I
shallMiscellaneous [aPPlications][ pending, ][if ][anY']A BHABHASKERstand [closed' ][However' ][there shall ][be ][no ord]Sd,- d,- [[,1.][er ][ VIJAY][as ][to costs']
shall
A BHABHASKERSd,- d,- JO SEloN [o]
,TTRUE [COPY'/]
SE
1. [The ][tncome Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench'A ][' Hyderabad][[Hyderabad]][[Hyderabad]]
To,
1. 2. [The ][Commissioner of ][lncome ][Tax' ][Appeals 12' ][[Hyderabad]]central 2. [The ][Commissioner of ][lncome ][Tax' ][Appeals 12' ][[Hyderabad]]central
central [circle 2(4)' ][Hvderabad]
3. [rhe ][Deputv ]"o'nrn'"'onl':;';;;:;'-' *ol [tjnior ][standing ][counser ror ][rncome ][rax]"o'nrn'"'onl':;';;;:;'-' *ol [tjnior ][standing ][counser ror ][rncome ][rax]t 3:;S:,:X|lb'rur['f 3:;S:,:X|lb'rur['f
Two [Copies]
5.
VAJgh
v)
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 tl2t2024
JUDGII,IENT
lTIA.No.69 of 2024
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS
WITHDRAWN
Sl'I,{!:.,d0tIri,i2lil:ii--\+to)i,,1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.