Itta/696/2014 Of Idea Cellular Ltd v. The Commissionr Of Income Tax (Tds)

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD N/ONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENTTHE HON'BLE THE ACTING [CHIEF JUSTICE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO]ANDTHE HON'LE SRI JUSTICE [T,VINOD KUMAR] NO. 10F 201IN/ANDINCOME TAX TR IBUNAL APPEAL [NO: 696][ o][ F ][2014] (lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under section [260 ] [of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act, ][1961]of the lncome Tax Act, against [the ][order ][of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal,]Hyderabad Bench ' A Hyderabad in ITA No. [1084 ]/ [Hyd ][12011 for ][assessment Year]" 2005-06 dated [preferred ][against ][the ][order ][of ][the ][commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax](Appeals )-ll Hyderabad in l.T.A. [No.0259 ][/ ][clT ][(A) ]-ll [/ ][09.10 ][dated ][25-03.201,1]preferred against the order of the Asst. [Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax, Circle ]['14 ][(2)']Hyderabad TAN No. HYD ['100916G ][dated 31-'12-200$] Between: IDEA CELLULAR LTD., [a ][company ][incorporated under ][the_companie^s Act,. ][1956 ][,]hu;i;glG R;gisterJO [Otfice at ][#'Ploino. ][18, ][Sunan ][T_owers, ][Sector 11, Gandhi.Nagar,]:AZOri anO tircle office [at ][kLX ][Estate, ][3rd ][Floor, ][Fateh ][Maidan ]_Road, [Hyderabad]SOOOOi n"p. OV i[s Au[norised [Representative, ][Mr.Giridhar ][Rao, ][lvlanager Legal ][and]Authorised Signatory ...APPELLANT AND The Commissioner of [lncome Tax (TDS), ][lT ][Towers' ][A.C ][Guards, Hyderabad'] ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under section 151 [CPC praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances stated ][in the]affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may be pleased ][to ][permit ][the]Appellant to withdraw the [present ][appeal ][in ITTA No. 696 of 2014'] Counsel for the Appellant: [T. ] Counsel for the Respondent: [B, ] The Court made the following: HONOURABLE THE ACTING SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [T.VINOD ] I.A. No. 1 of 2O2lIN/ANDLT.T.A. No.696 OF 2014 COMMON ORDER: (Per lhe Actitlg Clief Justice Sri M.S.RctrnacltLtLclra Ruo) The appeilant has filed LA.No.l of 2O21 [seeking]permission to withdraw the appeal in view of the order inForm No.3 dated 30.03.2021 [passed ]under the [Direct ][Tax]Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. 2. Having regard to the said plea, I.A.No.1 of 202 I [is]ordered and ITTA.No.696 ol 2014 is dismissed [as ][withdrar,'n'n.]In the event, the appellant does not get favourable [relief]under the said scheme, it is granted liberty to revive thisappeal. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this [appeal]sl-rall also stand clismissed. SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARd" //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ' A ', Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) -ll Hyderabad. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle -14 (2), Hyderabad. 4. One CC to Sri T. Bala Mohan Reddy, Advocate 5. One CC to Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, Advocate 6. Two CD Copies 7. One Spare Copy Kulgbrty HIGH COURT DATED: 0610912021 COMMON ORDER l.A.No.1 OF 2021IN/ANDITTA.No.696 of 2014 ([c][ lflE ][s],c(f',.)f'18 00t20ilt.... [-1,]\ "-'-..-^,.,-" [t'] ORDERING THE I.A. AND DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWNAS WITHDRAWN