Itta/697/2014 Of Idea Cellular Limited, Hyderabad v. The Commr Of Income Tax [Tds] Hyderabad
High Court
06 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/697/2014 Of Idea Cellular Limited, Hyderabad v. The Commr Of Income Tax [Tds] Hyderabad
Date of order
06 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/697/2014 Of Idea Cellular Limited, Hyderabad v. The Commr Of Income Tax [Tds] Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOROF TELANGANAAT HYDPREABXITE
Mo!p4y, THE STXTH DAy oF sEPTEIVBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
t.A.NO.1oF 2021IN/AND.T.T.A.NO.697 oF 201
lncome Tax Tribunar Appear under section 260-4 of the Income Tax Act -1961against the order dated 23.0s.2014 in l.T.A.No.'1083l1ydt2o11 Assessment yeat 2oo4-2005 to 2009-2010 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench'A', Hyderabad the Assessment year 2006-2007 to 2009-2010, preferred against the'A', Hyderabad the Assessment year 2006-2007 to 2009-2010, preferred against theorder dated 25.03.2011 in Appeat No.trA No.026ilctr [A]-il/09-10, on rhe fite of thecommissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-ll, Hyderabad preferred against the order inGIR/PAN No. Hyd 100916G on the fite of the lncome Tax officer, circle 14(2),Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
Between:
IDEA Cellular Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies, Act, 1956,382011, and Circle office at KLK having its Registered Office a1 # Estate,3rd Plot No.18, Suman Floor, Fateh Maidan Road, Hyderabad-510Towers, Sectoi 1'1 , Gandhi Nagar001, represented by its Authorised Representative Mr. Giridhar Rao, Manager-Legaland Authorised Signatory
...APPELLANT
AND
The Commissioner of lncome Tax [fDS] l.T. Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit theAppellant to withdraw the present appeal in ITTA No. 697 of 2014.the affidavit filed therewith, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit theAppellant to withdraw the present appeal in ITTA No. 697 of 2014.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI T. VINOD KUMAR, representingSRI T. BALA MOHAN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA, SC FOR l.T. DEPT.
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
HONOURABLE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA
AND
HONOURABLE [JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR]
I.A. No.L of 2O2lIN/ANDI.T.T.A. No.697 OF 2014
COMMON ORDER:
(Per the Acting Chief Justice Si M.SRamachandra [Rrro)]
The appellant has filed I.A.No.1 of 2O2l [seeking]permission to withdraw the appeal in view of the order inForm No.3 dated 30.03.202 1 passed under the Direct [Tax]Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
2. Having regard to the said p1ea, I.A.No.1 of 202 1 isordered and ITTA.No.697 of 2014 is dismissed as withdrawnIn the event, the appellant does not get favotLrable reliefunder the said scheme, it is granted liberty to revive thisappeal.
3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this appealshall also stand. dismissed.
SD/. M.SANTHI JOINT REGISTRARCtt
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Chairman, [lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal ]['A' ][Bench' Hyderabad]
2. The Commissioner [of lncome Tax ][Appeals-ll' ][Hyderabad.]
3. The lncome [Tax ][Officer, Circle ][14 ][(2), Hyderabad']
4. One CC to Sri [T. ][Bala Mohan ][Reddy, ][Advocate ]
5. One CC to Sri [B. Narasimha Sarman, ] [for lT ][Dept ][lOPUCl]
6. Two CD CoPies
7. One Spare [CoPY]gbrgbr
a.u-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0610912021
JUDGMENTf .A.No.1 of 2021IN/ANDlTTA.No.697 ot 2014
i{ET4 ,-€a<.tJ):-)25siP2U 2r't:,sr:a+
ORDERING THE !.A. AND DISMISSING THE I.T.T.A.AS WITHDRAWN
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.