Itta/698/2014 Of Idea Cellular Limited v. The Commissionr Of Income Tax (Tds)
High Court
07 Sep 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/698/2014 Of Idea Cellular Limited v. The Commissionr Of Income Tax (Tds)
Date of order
07 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/698/2014 Of Idea Cellular Limited v. The Commissionr Of Income Tax (Tds), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Having regard to the [said plea, ][the ][appeal ][is ][dismissed]as withdrawn with liberty [as ][prayed for.] 3Pending m iscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, ][in ][this ][appeal]sha1l also stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [M.S.RAMACHANDRA ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [T.VINOD KUMAR]
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 698
(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 [-A ][of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act, ][1961]against the order of the lncome [Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal, ][Hyderabad Bench ][' A ][',]Hyderabad in ITA No.1086t1ydt2011 , [for ][assessment Year 2007-08 ][dated ][2310512014]preferred against the order of the commissioner of [lncome ][Tax ][( ][Appeals ]) -ll,Hyderabad dated 25-03-2011 [in ][l.T.A. ][No. ][0255/ClT (A)-ll/09-10 ][preferred against the]order of the Assistant commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax ], [Circle ][-14 ][(2), ][Hyderabad. ][Dated]31-12-2OOg in ACIT [-14 ][(2) ][ITDS/Hyd./2009-10 ][/ ][Hvd 100916 ][G)]
Between:
IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED, [a ][Company incorporated under ][the companies ][Act,.1956,]n*ino its neoistered Office at # [Plbt nb ][18, Suman ][Towers, Sector ][1 ][1, ][Gandhi Nagar]38rb1i,'- ana- [-cirit" ]office at [Estate, ][3rd ][Floor, ][Fateh..Maidan ][Road,]HvOeraUaO - 500 OO1, represented [by ][its ][Authorised ][Representative, Mr. Giridhar ][Rao,]lr/'a nager-Legal and Authorised [Signatory]
...APPELLANT
AND
The Commissioner of lncome [Tax (TDS), I'T. Towers, A.C. Guards, ][Hyderabad.]
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI T. Counsel forthe Respondent: [B. ] The Court made the following:
HONOURABLE SRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA
ANDHONOURABLE SRI [JUSTICE T.VINOD ]
I.T.T.A. No.698 0F 2014
JUDGMENT:(Pet the Actiig Chief Justice Si [S.Rarnachandra ][Rao.)]
Learned counsel for the [appeilant ][seeks ][permission ][to]withdraw the appeal [with ][liberty to ][the appellant ][to ][revive the]appeal in the event it [does ][not ][get ][favourable relief ][under ][the]Direct Tax Vivad se [Vishwas ][Scheme, ][2020.]
2. Having regard to the [said plea, ][the ][appeal ][is ][dismissed]as withdrawn with liberty [as ][prayed for.]
3Pending m iscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, ][in ][this ][appeal]sha1l also stand dismissed.
SD/. M. SANTHI JOINT REGISTRARSECTION
//TRUE COPY//
ToTn" tn.o." Tax Appellate Tribunal' Hyderabad B.ench A Hyderabad'i] i. iii; b;;;ltiion"i [bt ][tniome ][rax ][( ][Appeals ][)-ll' ][Hvderabad]3. The Assistant [Commissioner of lncome ][Tax' ][Circle -14 ][(2) ][Hyderabad']4. One CC to [Sri. ][T. ][Bala Mohan Reddy' Advocate ]5. One CC [to Sri. ][B' ][Narasimha Sarma, Advocate ]
6. Two CD [Copies]7. One SPare [CoPY]kultp
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0710912021
ORDERITTA.No.698 of 2014
DISMISSING THE ITTA.AS WITHDRAWN.
wis\a
!,.u [l'4,]('aIt:)i ,,sEPml,:5, r-1..
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.