Itta/70/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N Madhusudhana
High Court
13 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/70/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N Madhusudhana
Date of order
13 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/70/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. N Madhusudhana, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.[No][ order][ as][ to]costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY .THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
.^
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
ITTA NO: 70 OF 2019
Appeal under Section 260 A of Income Tax Act 1961,[aggrieved][ by]the order dated 26.09.2018 inI.T.A.No.(Assessment year 2010-2011)before the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad[Benches]“B”, Hyderabad and preferred against the order of the[Commissioner][ of]Income Tax (Appeals), Kurnool, dated 23.03.2015 bearing Appeal No. ITANo. 97/CIT(A),Knl/2013-14 and preferred against the[order][ of][ the][ Income-]TaxOfficer,Ward-1ProddaturinPANNo.ALPPM0758/A.Y.2010-2011/ITO/ Proddatur, dated 30.03.2013.
Between:
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kurnool Charge, [ Complex,]D.No. 43-128-3, Prakash nagar, Kurnool - 518001.
...APPELLANT
AND
N Madhusudhana, Prop. inM/S. Himalaya Transport, 15-1745-1,Vijayanagar colony, Tadipatri, Anantapur - (PAN No. [ 0758H).]
...RESPONDENT
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petitionunder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,[the][ High][ Court][ may][ be]from of the certified copy of the order of Hon belpleased to dispense withTribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad in the above appeal in the[interest][ of][ justice]and pass such order or order as this Hon'bel court[deem][ fit][ and][ proper][ in]the circumstances of the case.
: SRI B NARASIMHA SARMACounsel for the Appellant
Counsel for the Respondents : SRI DUNDU MANMOHAN
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
I.T.T.A. No.70 of 2019
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
The learned counsel for the appellant-Department prays[leave][ of]
theCourt to withdraw the instant appeal, as it falls below[the][ monetary]limits (i.e. Rs.2 Crores) fixed by the Board, vide[Circular][ No.09/2024][ in]F.No.279/Misc./M-74/2024-ITJ, dated 17.09.2024.The[learned][ counsel]fortheappellant has also filed into Court a copy of the certificate.receivedfromtheAssistant Commissionerof Income-Tax,Circle-1,Kurnool,which contains instructions to withdraw the appealfortheaforementioned reason,
submission of the learned counsel for the appellant[is][ placed]2)Theon record. Leave granted.
3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.[No][ order][ as][ to]costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any,[shall][ stand]
.VENKATA RAMANASD/- Pjoint
closed.
//true copy//
SECTION OFFICER
To
income Tax Appellate1. TheHyderabad.
Benches “B”, atTribunal, Hyderabad
i
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeai), Kurnool, Kurnool
2. TheDistrict.District.
Tax Officer, Circle-1 Proddatur.Kaddapa District.
3. The Income-
Narasimha Sarma Advocate
4. One CC to Sri. B
Dundu Manmohan Advocate
5. One CC to Sri.
6. Three CD Copies
TAC
HIGH COURTDATED:13/12/2024
JUDGMENTITTA.No.70 of 2019507 APR 2025^. Current Section ^
DISMISSING THIS ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.