Case LawHigh Court › Itta/710/2017 Of Principal Commissioner...

Itta/710/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Makin Annapurna

High Court 22 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/710/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Makin Annapurna
Date of order
22 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/710/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Makin Annapurna, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the issues raised in both these cases are common and as the above mentioned appeal was dismissed, following the same reasons as were assigned in the order dismissing the said appeal, this appeal is also dismissed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _____________________ (T.Amarnath G...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD I.T.T.A.No.710 of 2017Date: 22.11.2017 Between: Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-II, … Visakhapatnam. Appellant And Smt.Makina Annapurna, D.No.1-173, Mithilapuri Vuda Layout, … Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam Respondent : Counsel for the Appellant Mrs.M.Kiranmayee, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department : Counsel for the Respondents The Court made the following: Judgment: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This appeal is filed by the revenue against common order dated 02.02.2017, to the extent it pertains to I.T.A.No.604/Vizag/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam. 2. The issue raised in this appeal relates to penalty for non- disclosure of income derived from development agreement. At the hearing, Smt.M.Kiranmayee, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, submitted that I.T.T.A.No.668 of 2017 filed against the same common order against which the present appeal is filed, qua I.T.A.No.605/Vizag/2014, was dismissed by this Court by order dated 01.11.2017. 3. As the issues raised in both these cases are common and as the above mentioned appeal was dismissed, following the same reasons as were assigned in the order dismissing the said appeal, this appeal is also dismissed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _____________________ (T.Amarnath Goud, J) CVNR,J & TA, J I.T.T.A.No.710 of 2017 Date: 22.11.2017
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan