Itta/71/2003 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Hyd v. M/S Haggulunds Dension Ltd Hyd
High Court
11 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/71/2003 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Hyd v. M/S Haggulunds Dension Ltd Hyd
Date of order
11 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/71/2003 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Hyd v. M/S Haggulunds Dension Ltd Hyd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal, therefore, does not deserve consideration on merits and is accordingly dismissed on this short ground.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD
I.T.T.A.No.71 of 2003
JUDGMENT :(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, fairly states that the tax effect in this appeal is less than the monetary limits fixed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes under Circular No.21 of 2015, dated 10.12.2015.
2. The appeal, therefore, does not deserve consideration on merits and is accordingly dismissed on this short ground. Liberty is however given to the Revenue to take appropriate steps if it is found hereinafter that the said instructions of the Central Board of Direct Taxes would not cover this mater. No order as to costs.
_______________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
_______________________________
GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J
2
SK,J & GSP,J
ITTA.No.71 of 2003
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD
I.T.T.A.No.71 of 2003
11.07.2017 Msr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue