Itta/71/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd
High Court
08 Apr 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/71/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd
Date of order
08 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/71/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Miscellaneous petitions pending in the appeal, if any, also stand disposed of. __________________ Dilip B.Bhosale, J ________________________ 8[th] April, 2015. sur
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
I.T.T.A. No.71 of 2004
JUDGMENT :(per Hon'ble Sri Justice Dilip B.Bhosale)
This appeal was called out yesterday for ‘final hearing’, when learned counselfor the appellant, at the outset, invited our attention to the judgment dated12.11.2014 passed by the Division Bench in I.T.T.A. No.254 of 2003 in respect ofthe very same assessee and submitted that the question raised in that appeal and inthe instant appeal is identical, and therefore, this appeal may be disposed ofanswering the question in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. Sincelearned counsel for the respondent had not seen the said judgment, he took time togo through the same. Accordingly, the appeal was adjourned.
Today, learned counsel for the respondent fairly submits that this appeal canbe disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 12.11.2014 passed in I.T.T.A.No.254of 2003 answering the question as framed in the Memorandum of Appeal in favour ofthe Revenue and against the assessee.
Thus, the appeal is allowed and disposed of as such, answering the questionraised in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending in the appeal, if any, also stand disposed of.
__________________
Dilip B.Bhosale, J
________________________
8[th] April, 2015.
sur
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.