Case LawHigh Court › Itta/71/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Itta/71/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. M/S. Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd

High Court 23 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/71/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. M/S. Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd
Date of order
23 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/71/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. M/S. Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Ashok,learned counsel for the appellant, to ascertain as to whether anyappeal has been preferred against the judgment of the Tribunal inassessee’s own case in the earlier assessment order.

Decision: We, therefore, dismiss this appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.71 OF 2013 DATED:23.7.2013 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-IIHyderabad … Appellant And M/s. Sirpur Paper Mills Limited5-9-22/1/1, I FloorAshoka ChambersAdarsh NagarHyderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. NO.71 OF 2013 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) On 9.7.2013, we adjourned the matter to enable Mr. S.R. Ashok,learned counsel for the appellant, to ascertain as to whether anyappeal has been preferred against the judgment of the Tribunal inassessee’s own case in the earlier assessment order. Today heinformed this Court that he is unable to ascertain whether any appealhas been preferred. We have gone through the impugned judgment and order of thelearned Tribunal. It appears, the learned Tribunal has followed its earlier decisionin assessee’s own case. In that case, the order of the Delhi Tribunalhas been followed. As there has been no information about preferringof appeal against the judgment and order of the Delhi Tribunal, we donot find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal. There will be no order as tocosts. ________________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ______________________ K.C. BHANU, J 23.7.2013
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan