Itta/7/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - I v. Anagha Surface Transport Pvt Ltd
High Court
20 Mar 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/7/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - I v. Anagha Surface Transport Pvt Ltd
Date of order
20 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/7/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - I v. Anagha Surface Transport Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.Nos.7 & 20 of 2015
DATED:20.03.2015
Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,Hyderabad.And
… Appellant
Anagha Surface Transport Pvt. Ltd.,JPN Nagar, Miyapur,Hyderabad.
….Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.Nos.7 and 20 of 2015
Common Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
These appeals are dismissed as we find that theimpugned order was passed on 11.3.2013 and nearly two yearshave gone by.
The learned Tribunal has passed the order of remandgiving a direction to the Assessing Officer compelling theassessee to produce the books of accounts and thereafter toproceed in accordance with law. It was also mentioned in theorder that if the books of accounts are not produced again, theAssessing Officer will be free to proceed with the matter inaccordance with law.
We do not find any illegality in this order. The Tribunal hasjurisdiction to do so and that is what it has done.
The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
Pending miscellaneous applications shall also standclosed. No order as to costs.
__________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR,
J
20[th] March, 2015
Pnb
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.