Itta/72/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Hyd v. M/S Diamond Hatcheries
High Court
30 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/72/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Hyd v. M/S Diamond Hatcheries
Date of order
30 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/72/2001 Of Commissioner Of Incometax Hyd v. M/S Diamond Hatcheries, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending consideration inthese appeals shall stand disposed of. ___________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
I.T.T.A.Nos.68 and 72 of 2001
Date: 30.07.2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
A.P.-I, Hyderabad.
.....Appellant
AND
M/s Diamond Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd.,Hyderabad.
...Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
I.T.T.A.Nos.68 and 72 of 2001
COMMON JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
By a detailed judgment, today, we have allowedI.T.T.A.No.49 of 2001. For the reasons recorded therein, theseAppeals are also allowed. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending consideration inthese appeals shall stand disposed of.
___________________
K.J.
SENGUPTA, CJ
_______________
K.C.BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue