Itta/72/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Management Service (P) Ltd
High Court
20 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/72/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Management Service (P) Ltd
Date of order
20 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/72/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Management Service (P) Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed. __________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 72 of 2014
DATED:20.2.2014
Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad. … AppellantAnd
M/s. Nagarjuna Management Services (P) Ltd.,Hyderabad.….Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 72 of 2014
Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta)
We have heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for theappellant and have gone through the impugned judgment and orderof the learned Tribunal dated. The appeal is sought to be preferred on the followingsuggested question of law.
1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, theTribunal is correct in law, in holding that once loss is determined,in the earlier years, the assessing officer is duty bound to allowthe carry forward and set off of such loss in the subsequentyears, irrespective of the fact that nature of the loss of the earlieryears cannot be carried forward and set off as against thebusiness income of the subsequent year ?Tribunal is correct in law, in holding that once loss is determined,in the earlier years, the assessing officer is duty bound to allowthe carry forward and set off of such loss in the subsequentyears, irrespective of the fact that nature of the loss of the earlieryears cannot be carried forward and set off as against thebusiness income of the subsequent year ?
After going through the judgment and order of the learnedTribunal and after hearing Mr. Prasad, learned counsel for theappellant, we are of the view that the impugned judgment andorder does not call for any interference as both the Tribunal andthe Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) have taken a correctlegal view that once the loss of the business is worked out and
has been accepted by the Assessing Officer, it is his duty to carryforward the same in the subsequent assessment year and to allowsetting off of the loss of business income for the subsequentyears. This is the settled position of law and it has been followednot only by the learned Tribunal, but also by the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals).
Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
__________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
20.2.2014
PNB
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.