Case LawHigh Court › Itta/725/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/725/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. M/S Heritage Foods (India) Ltd

High Court 30 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/725/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. M/S Heritage Foods (India) Ltd
Date of order
30 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/725/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. M/S Heritage Foods (India) Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 725 of 2014 Date: 30.12.2014 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad. … Appellant AndM/s. Heritage Food (India) Limited,Hyderabad. … Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 725 of 2014 JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal is sought to be preferred against the judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal dated 13.11.2013 in relation to theassessment year 2007-08. The assessee lost before both the authorities below. Hence,appeal was taken to the learned Tribunal on the question of taxability ofthe capital gains in relation to the transaction of an agreement for sale. Both the authorities below found in favour of the Revenue. However, thelearned Tribunal upset it on appreciating the admitted fact that there hasnot been any completion of transaction in relation to the agreement ofsale of property, meaning thereby, transfer of interest within thedefinition of Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 did not take placein relevant previous year, and found that this transaction could becompleted in subsequent year. Consequently, the income by way ofcapital gains will accrue in the subsequent year also. In view of the aforesaid factual findings the learned Tribunal hasconcluded rightly to grant the benefit as asked for by the assessee. Wethink the learned Tribunal has correctly directed the Assessing Officer towork out the solution given by the assessee to deal with the assessmentyear 2008-09. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugnedorder of the learned Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ Date: 30.12.2014 ES ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan