Itta/73/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi, Hyderabad v. Smt. K. Pramila

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY I.T.T.A.NO.73 OF 2008 JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan} Heard Sri T.Vinod Kumar, learned Standing Counsel forIncome Tax Department and Sri A.V.Krishna Koundinya, learnedcounsel for the respondent. While the Income Tax Department sought withdrawal of theappeal on the ground that the Central Board of Direct Taxes inCircular No.21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 directed them to withdrawall appeals whose monetary limit is below Rs.20,00,000/-, the orderdated 02.03.2016 erroneously refers to the appeal as having beenfiled under the Central Excise Act, and to the limits prescribed, forwithdrawal of appeals, therunder. The order dated 02.03.2016 is recalled and substituted by thefollowing order: “In this appeal, Sri T.Vinod Kumar, learned Standing Counselfor Income Tax Department, has requested that the appellant bepermitted to withdraw their appeal, in view of the circularinstructions issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in CircularNo.21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 whereby the appeals, whosemonetary limit is below Rs.20,00,000/-, were required to bewithdrawn. Permission is accorded and the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneouspetitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.” ______________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J) 9[th] March 2016 RRB ___________________________________ (M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J)