Itta/732/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Mailflorex Ltd
High Court
31 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/732/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Mailflorex Ltd
Date of order
31 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/732/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Mailflorex Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 732 of 2014
DATE: 31.12.2014
Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
AndM/s. Malli Florex Ltd.,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 732 of 2014
Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
This appeal has been preferred without filing the certified copyof the order of the learned Tribunal and the Office in our view is notcareful in scrutinizing the appeal. The Office perhaps was misledwhile allowing this matter to be registered noting certified copy of theorder of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals).
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shallalso stand closed. No costs.
_________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 31stDecember, 2014pnb
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue