Case LawHigh Court › Itta/735/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/735/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Lumbini Constructions Ltd

High Court 31 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/735/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Lumbini Constructions Ltd
Date of order
31 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/735/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Lumbini Constructions Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 735 of 2014 DATE: 31.12.2014 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad. … Appellant And M/s. Lumbini Constructions Ltd.,Hyderabad. … Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 735 of 2014 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal is sought to be preferred against the judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal dated 23.9.2011 in relation to theassessment year 2006-2007 on the following suggested questions oflaw. 1. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the order of the Tribunal isperverse ? 2. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law,in setting aside the order of the CIT passed underSection 263 of the Act ? The learned Tribunal, on fact, found that the provision underSection 69 of the Income Tax Act was wrongly invoked. The factfinding has not been alleged to be perverse. In that view of the matter,we do not find any element of law to be decided in this appeal. Hence, this appeal is dismissed. Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shallalso stand closed. No costs. _________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ Date: 31stDecember, 2014pnb _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan