Case LawHigh Court › Itta/74/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itta/74/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Manga Infotech Pvt Ltd

High Court 20 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/74/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Manga Infotech Pvt Ltd
Date of order
20 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/74/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Manga Infotech Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Nothing has been said whether the decision of theSpecial Bench of the Tribunal of Madras has been upset or anappeal is pending against the said decision.

Decision: In that view of the matter, we dismiss this appeal as wecannot encourage the shifting stand of the Revenue. __________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 74 of 2014 DATED:20.2.2014 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad.And … Appellant M/s. Magna Infotech Pvt. Ltd.,Hyderabad.….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 74 of 2014 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta) We have heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for theappellant and have gone through the impugned judgment and orderof the learned Tribunal dated 20.12.2012. It appears, the learned Tribunal has followed the decision ofthe Special Bench of the Madras Tribunal inI.T.A. Nos. 1138/Mds./2007 and 1141/Mds/2007,dated 2.11.2012. The facts and circumstances of this case areidentical with the decision of the Special Bench of the MadrasTribunal. Nothing has been said whether the decision of theSpecial Bench of the Tribunal of Madras has been upset or anappeal is pending against the said decision. In that view of the matter, we dismiss this appeal as wecannot encourage the shifting stand of the Revenue. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 20.2.2014
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan