Case Law › High Court › Itta/75/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itta/75/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. M/S Lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd

High Court 24 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

24 Jul 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/75/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv v. M/S Lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the same, this appeal is also dismissed. ________________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C BHANU I.T.T.A. No. 75 of 2013 DATED: 24.7.2013 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-IVHyderabad. … AppellantAndM/s. Lanco Kondapalli Power Pvt. Ltd.,Hyderabad. … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C BHANU I.T.T.A. No. 75 of 2013 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) It is stated that against the impugned common and judgmentand order, an appeal, being I.T.T.A. No. 62 of 2013 was preferredand the said appeal has been dismissed by this Bench on23.7.2013. In view of the same, this appeal is also dismissed. ________________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ______________________ K.C. BHANU, J 24.07.2013 pnb

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.