Case Law › High Court › Itta/75/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of...

Itta/75/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Smt.g.venkata Lakshmi

High Court 02 Jul 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

02 Jul 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/75/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Smt.g.venkata Lakshmi, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A. No. 75 of 2015 ORDER:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Chandraiah) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel forboth the parties submit that the substantial question of law raised in thisappeal is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in ITTANo.471 of 2014, dated 25.07.2014. In that view of the matter, we do notfind any question for deciding afresh in this appeal. 2. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this appeal, shall standclosed. ______________________ G. CHANDRAIAH, J 02[nd] July, 2015 ksm _____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM ksm I.T.T.A. No. 75 of 2015 02[nd] July, 2015

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.