Itta/76/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Anand Food Products
High Court
25 Jun 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/76/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Anand Food Products
Date of order
25 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/76/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv v. M/S. Anand Food Products, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.76 of 2013
DATE: 25.06.2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-VI,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s. Anand Food ProductsHyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A No.76 of 2013
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
This appeal is sought to be admitted on the following suggested
substantial question of law.
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case theappellate Tribunal is justified in disposing of the appeal in ITANo.1180/Hyd/2011, in spite of the order passed in ITANo.598/Hyd/09, dated 23.04.2010 by the appellate Tribunal insofar asnullifying the order of Commissioner of Income Tax passed underSection 263 of Income Tax Act did not become final by reason ofpendency of the appeal preferred against before the Hon’ble HighCourt?”
It appears from the impugned order that the Tribunal has held that inview of its earlier decision dated 23.04.2010 the matter does not require anyfurther adjudication, as the point involved in it is consequential in nature. Therefore, we do not find anything wrong on the part of the Tribunal infollowing its earlier decision. Hence, on the suggested question of law thisappeal cannot be adjudicated. However, we make it clear that in the event ofthe revenue succeeding in the pending appeal, it is open for it to question thepresent issue.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
______________
G. ROHINI, J
Date: 25.06.2013ES
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.