Itta/76/2014 Of Commr Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Nine Star Communications Pvt Ltd
High Court
21 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/76/2014 Of Commr Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Nine Star Communications Pvt Ltd
Date of order
21 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/76/2014 Of Commr Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Nine Star Communications Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.76 of 2014
Date: 21.02.2014
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad
.....Appellant
AND
M/s Nine Star Communications Pvt. LtdHyderabad.
...Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.76 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta )
This appeal is sought to be preferred and admitted againstthe judgment and order of the learned Tribunal dated 28[th] June,2013 in relation to the assessment year 2006-07 on the followingsuggested question of law:
“Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal iscorrect in holding the amounts collected by theassessee are not its receipts and that the paymentsmade to M/s ABPL do not attract provisions ofSection 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant andgone through the impugned judgment and order of the learnedTribunal.
It appears that the learned Tribunal on fact found that theassessee has duly accounted for the income in its books ofaccount and this has also been confirmed by further fact-finding inthe manner as follows:
“M/s ABPL has duly accounted for thereceipts in its books of account and the same werecorroborated by confirmation letters dated23.05.2011.”
In view of the aforesaid fact-finding, we do not find anydecision is to be rendered and the law has been applied correctly.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. Miscellaneous petitionspending, if any, shall also stand closed.
___________________
K.J.
SENGUPTA, CJ
__________________J
SANJAY KUMAR,
21-2-2014 Gsn
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.