Itta/77/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Hyderabad v. M/S. P.e.s.engineers (P) Ltd
High Court
25 Jun 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/77/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Hyderabad v. M/S. P.e.s.engineers (P) Ltd
Date of order
25 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/77/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Hyderabad v. M/S. P.e.s.engineers (P) Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.77 of 2013
DATE: 25.06.2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s. P.E.S. Engineers (P) Ltd.,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A No.77 of 2013
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
This appeal is sought to be admitted on the following suggested
substantial question of law.
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,the Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the assessee is entitledfor deduction under Section 80 IB of the Act?”
The learned counsel for the appellant contended that the finding of theTribunal that the assessee is entitled for deduction under Section 80 IB of theIncome Tax Act is based on no evidence and hence the impugned order maybe set aside.
The learned Tribunal following its earlier order passed in theassessee’s case in ITA.No.1407/Hyd/2011, dated 16.11.2011, dismissed theappeal filed by the revenue by the impugned order. Since the revenue hasnot filed any appeal against the earlier order of the Tribunal passed in favourof the assessee and in the absence of any material to show that the assesseeis not entitled for deduction under Section 80 IB of the Act, we are unable toaccept the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant. We do not findany illegality or infirmity in the impugned order and the appeal is liable to bedismissed.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 25.06.2013
ES
______________
G. ROHINI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.