Itta/79/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Shri Shikari Viswanatham
High Court
20 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/79/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Shri Shikari Viswanatham
Date of order
20 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/79/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Shri Shikari Viswanatham, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Following the orderpassed by the Division bench in ITTA No.490 of 2013 dated23.10.2013, this appeal must also be, and is accordingly, dismissed.The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also standdismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
I.T.T.A.No.79 of 2016
JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, Learned Senior Standing Counsel forIncome Tax would fairly state that, against a common order passed bythe Tribunal in ITA No.326 of 2009 and batch dated 30.04.2012, ITTANo.490 of 2013 was preferred against the order passed in ITA No.326of 2009, and the said appeal was dismissed by a Division bench ofthis Court by its order in ITTA No.490 of 2013 dated 23.10.2013. Thepresent appeal arises out of the order passed by the Tribunal in ITANo.331 of 2009 dated 30.04.2012 which forms part of the batch ofappeals in ITA No.326 of 2009. ITA No.326 of 2009 was dismissed bya Division bench of this Court on 23.10.2013. Following the orderpassed by the Division bench in ITTA No.490 of 2013 dated23.10.2013, this appeal must also be, and is accordingly, dismissed.The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also standdismissed. No costs.
_____________________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
Date: 20.06.2016
___________________________________
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
MRKR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue