Itta/79/2018 Of Dr.t.indira Gouri v. Income Tax Officer

[ [33861] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No: 79 of 2018 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act, [1961]against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench [' ]B',Hyderabad in ITA No.947lt1ydl2o16, for assessment Year 2005-06 dated ['18-10-]2007 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax [(Appeals),]Vijayawada, Appeal No.238/CIT(A)A/JA/TN12-13, datedi2T-03-2013, [preferred]against the Order of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward-8(2), [Hyderabad, ] No. , dated 28-1 1 -2o1 1 - Between: Dr.T. lndira Gouri, Mis lndira Hospital, NH No.T,Shamshabad,Hyderabad-50121 S,Ranga Reddy District. ...APPELLANT AND tncome Tax Officer, Ward-8(2),Hyderabad,Signature Towers,Opposite BotanicalGardens,Kondapur,Hyderabad-500 084. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SRI A.V.A. SIVA KARTIKEYA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI J.V. PRASAD, [Sr.SC FOR INCOME ] DEPARTMENT The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANAALISHETTY I.T.T.A. No.79 of 2O18 ORDER (per Hon'ble Sn Justice P.SAM KOSHY) Heard A.V.A.Siva Kartikeya, learned counsel for the appellant, and Mr.J.V.Prasad, learned Senior StandingCounsel, appearing for the respondent. Perused thematerial on record. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has already approached the Central Board ofDirect Taxes under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act,2O2O and Form-3 was also issued the by designatedauthority approving the application of the assessee and atthis juncture he does not intend to pursue the matter andby designatedauthority approving the application of the assessee and atthis juncture he does not intend to pursue the matter andseeks permission of this Court to withdraw the presentappeal.appeal. 3. Permission is accorded 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The right of the appellant is reserved to approach thisCourt and revive the same in the event of any grievance. cI l 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any in this writ petition, shall stand closed. Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT RISTRARsEciloFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench'B', Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada. 3. The lncome Tax Officer, Ward-8(2), Hyderabad. 4. One CC to SRI A.V.A. SIVA KARTIKEYA, Advocate 5. One CC to SRI J.V. PRASAD, Sr.SC FOR INCOME TAX DEPARTMENTloPUclloPUcl 6. Two CD Copies kam a r HIGH COURTPSK,J & LNA,JDATED:2310812023 ORDER lTTA.No.79 of 2018 THE APPEAL IS DISMISSEDAS WITHDRAWNAS WITHDRAWN @)q\s160I\ ,.__r:----,4- -i;i,,- i t:,1.\._>'(1s [sEP ][M]_:- :i,- l,l.., 'i,/