Itta/80/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd
High Court
20 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/80/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd
Date of order
20 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/80/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the liberty as pr.ayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE ANDTHE HONOURABLE
INCOME [T]AX [NO: ][80][ oF ][2012]
Appeal under [section ][260-4' ][of ].the [lncome Tax ][Act-1961 ][' ][against]the order dated. [27-o6'20ciB ];;;;; [i; ][i ][t ] [r'ro ssrlH/06 ][for Assessment ][Year]2000-2001 [on ][tfe ][file ot ][t#l;Ion]" ][i'i ][npptrr't" ][Tribunal ][Hvderabad Benches]"B". Hvderabad preferred "dli"tiih" [oiJeiolieo-zr ][os ]commissioner [2006 ][oaised ][of ][in lTA No ][lncome ][rax][319]to 32ilAclr-16(1/clr(A)-v7itj0"d [H;';h" ][nr" ]"{tr'9 (Aooeals) - V, Hvderabad ;;;f""; [ll'intt ][fl't" ][Order dated ][22'022006 ][passed ][in]FXtUiiR/ No''AAACt\ft266";;'th;li; [oi-t,J ][assist"nt ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome]Tax, Circle [16(1), HYderabad']
Between:
The Commissioner [of lncome ][Tax-lV, ][Hyderabad]
...APPELLANT
AND
Nagarjuna [Aqua Exports Ltd ][, ][6, Nagarjuna ][Hills' ][Punjagutta' Hyderabad-82]
...RESPONDENT
Counsel [for ][the ][Appellant: ][SRI' J V PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)]
Counsel for [the ][Respondent: ][Ms' ] [RAM']Learned [Counsel]
The Court [delivered ][the ][following: ]
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENryAS RAO
INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.8O of 2Ot2
JUDGMENT: @er the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Arod.he)
Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income TaxDepartment for the appellant.
Ms. K.Prabhabati, learned counsel representing Mr. A.V.Raghu
Ram, learned counsel for the respondent.
2.
Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant seeks
ieave of this court to withdraw the appeal in the right of the circurarNo'09/2024, dated 17.o9.2024, with the liberty to reviv. the same incase the subject matter of the appeal falls in any of the exceptionsprovided in the Circula:. No.S/2024 dated 15.O3.2024.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the liberty as pr.ayed for.
MiscellaleorLs applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAOJOINTEGlafRAR//TRUE COPY//5SECTION OFFICER
\To
1The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches "8", Hyderabad2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - V, Hyderabad.2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - V, Hyderabad.3.The Assistant Commissioner of lncomb Tax, Circle i 6(1), Hyderabad.4.One CC to SRl. J V PRASAD, SC FOR TNCOME TAX t6p0clOne CC to SRl. A V RAGHU RAII/. Advocate IOPUC]rao 3Two CD Copiesl{{'n'sr,One CC to SRl. A V RAGHU RAII/. Advocate IOPUC]rao 3Two CD Copiesl{{'n'sr,
HIGH COURT
DATED:20112t2024
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.80 ot 2012
DISMISSING THE !.T.T.AAS WITHDRAWN
I[G3Hf ][i][vds]tt ['.)]l.'ii,\gue ,tlt,t 6 0ol_,_ ../6\l/u, ^ ,..\.-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.