Case LawHigh Court › Itta/803/2017 Of Alugubelli Nagabhushana...

Itta/803/2017 Of Alugubelli Nagabhushana Rao v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 02 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/803/2017 Of Alugubelli Nagabhushana Rao v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
02 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/803/2017 Of Alugubelli Nagabhushana Rao v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether the ITO is justified in selecting the account of the appellant for enquiry without any justification, and in applying the reports of media to the case of the appellant and taxing him accordingly”.

Decision: Following the said order, this appeal is also dismissed, with a direction that the reasons and findings rendered therein, shall form part of this order.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL I.T.T.A.No.803 of 2017 Date: 02.01.2018 Between: Alugubelli Nagabhushana Rao, Prop: Naidu Wines, Ungradametta village, …. Vizianagaram district. Appellant And The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Srikakulam … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.P.Rama Sharana Sarma : Counsel for the Respondents Mr. K.Raji Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax The Court made the following: Judgment : (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This appeal by the assessee is filed against order dated 26.07.2017 in I.T.A.No.14/Vizag/2016 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam, raising the following substantial questions of law: “1. Whether the Tribunal is justified in fixing the profit percentage randomly without any scientific methodology, that too basing on the media reports, when it makes the difference of lakhs of rupees to the assessee? 2. Whether the authorities can rely on the books of accounts, when the same has been rejected by the same authorities and cost the assessee on the basis of the accounts only? 3. Whether the Tribunal is justified in showing the unsecured loans as income from other sources? 4. Whether the ITO is justified in selecting the account of the appellant for enquiry without any justification, and in applying the reports of media to the case of the appellant and taxing him accordingly”. 2. At the hearing, Mr.Rama Sharana Sarma, learned counsel for the appellant, fairly conceded that the issues identical to those raised in this appeal, have been decided by this Court by its order dated 26.12.2017 in I.T.T.ANo.795 of 2017. 3. Following the said order, this appeal is also dismissed, with a direction that the reasons and findings rendered therein, shall form part of this order. 4. CVNR,J & MSKJ, J I.T.T.A.No.803 of 2017 Date: 02.01.2018 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications filed by the appellant, are disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _____________________ Date: 2[nd] January, 2018 msb (M.S.K.Jaiswal, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan