Itta/806/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds), Hyderabad v. M/S. Nsl Limited
High Court
09 Aug 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/806/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds), Hyderabad v. M/S. Nsl Limited
Date of order
09 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
1993-94
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/806/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Tds), Hyderabad v. M/S. Nsl Limited, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. LAXMI NARAYANA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No: 806 OF 2006
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act,1961 arising out of the order of the lncome-Tax Appellate Tribunal, HyderabadBench ' B' Hyderabad, in ITA No.5BB/Hyd/1996, for Assessment Year 1993-94dated 3'1-'1-2006 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax ,(Appeals-ll), Hyderabad, Appeal No. 64/lTO-5(9yClT(A)-ll/ Hyd/95-96, dated:18-12-1995, prefered against the Order of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward-5(9), Hyderabad,No. N-0130-EM.5(9)/Hyd/95-96, dated 31-03-1995.1961 arising out of the order of the lncome-Tax Appellate Tribunal, HyderabadBench ' B' Hyderabad, in ITA No.5BB/Hyd/1996, for Assessment Year 1993-94dated 3'1-'1-2006 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax ,(Appeals-ll), Hyderabad, Appeal No. 64/lTO-5(9yClT(A)-ll/ Hyd/95-96, dated:18-12-1995, prefered against the Order of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward-5(9), Hyderabad,No. N-0130-EM.5(9)/Hyd/95-96, dated 31-03-1995.
Between:
The Commissioner of lncome Tax(TDS), Hyderabad
AND
M/s. NSL Limited, Nagarjuna Hills, Hyderabad-soo 482.
...APPELLANT
..,RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. A. RADHA KRISHNA, Learned Senior StandingCounSel appearing for SRI V.R. BADRI, SC FOR INCOME TAX.
Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI CH. PUSHYAM KIRAN
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
IIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOI;TIY
AND
TH IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. LAXMI NARAI'AIiIA
I.T.T.A. No.806 of 2006
JUDGMENTf)r [/ ][)ir'.)/.-:.S/r.;i/sttc, ]P.SAM KOSHY)
Hcarcl i\'. A. Racll.ra Kr-ishna, leamed Scnior. l: an,ling Counsel
aPr)c:lllnu [,,1 ]ri Plrclli [r ][l rr]
2. This; alrp a undcr Sectior)260A of the lncomc 'l'it.. .{,tt, 196 1. hasbct'n pre[L'r-r r:r] I t' thc licvcrrut.Sthe apltcl an L t, urr:jt th(. orderdt..l I 0l.2,lOr: ,i. sccl br,thc ln c c rir,'lax Appclli Ltc 'li llrnal. I-h'clcrabacilJcnclt Ll'. JIirlr [';L ]tacl. trrI T A.\ri ;8!i/tlvd/ l9q6 ti)r trr , .\ss,,ssmcnt year199:l-(r.+.
3. Cen ral Irr rd ol l)i r.ct ['lrrx,.s ](CBDT) has rssrrr:d ( rr.crrl:rr No.l7 o120 [I(l ]drUSoEl' 19. anir rrclrru tltc llrcvrorrs Cirrrrl:rr \tr.3 oI 20igdr. i.0/.10 llt,' [lurthr,L ][r ][nlurni.irtrl ][!lrc ][r:rotrctirr-v ][lirnrls ][r. ][tilit.rg ][appeal-s]bt ihc: Irrcomr. ['l]rr Dcpartrrcnl ltcf,rrc tlre Int:omc l.ar ,\ tf,:llatc [.l.rjbut.rals.]Flt git Cour s rrn,lrrprt rrrr' CoLtrt iLS;r filcirsurc [cr rcrlrr- ltg ]rtigation. Inparagraph -) 1'r,. saicl Ci:r-Lr [j;rr, ]u<' fincl that the m()ne ir.! I mit fixed forhling an appci I Ir' rr( th(. I,iglr (lrrrr-r s Ils. LO0 c.ro.c.
4. Lr tl: c irrstr I itpl)rral lar e l-li, t is well bclow the n:.crL. Lr.rrv limil5 J'her- frrr . l:e :rpp.rrr fftrl ir,' tl.' I)cpirrrmcnt is .ris rri.scc ln lorms ofl.ltc irlbrrsaLcl (-1r uii| 1\o 1,/ sl'12()l ) (11.08.0g.20I9 llo.v,r ,l , if thr. .rppoalcomcs *'i1h :r rlrr c ;r:.pr i.n trrrlr'r' P r.rgrrrpr-r r0 of cir( arir. No 3 of 20 rg, it
\
would be open to the [lncome ][Tax Department ][to ][seek ][revlval of the ][appeal]No order as to costs
6Consequently, miscellaneous [petitions pending, ][if ][any, ][sha11 ][stand]
closed
4. Lr tl: c irrstr I itpl)rral lar e l-li, t is well bclow the n:.crL. Lr.rrv limil5 J'her- frrr . l:e :rpp.rrr fftrl ir,' tl.' I)cpirrrmcnt is .ris rri.scc ln lorms ofl.ltc irlbrrsaLcl (-1r uii| 1\o 1,/ sl'12()l ) (11.08.0g.20I9 llo.v,r ,l , if thr. .rppoalcomcs *'i1h :r rlrr c ;r:.pr i.n trrrlr'r' P r.rgrrrpr-r r0 of cir( arir. No 3 of 20 rg, it
\
would be open to the [lncome ][Tax Department ][to ][seek ][revlval of the ][appeal]No order as to costs
6Consequently, miscellaneous [petitions pending, ][if ][any, ][sha11 ][stand]
closed
To,1.The lncome-Tax [Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench ][' ][B' ][Hyderabad']2.The Commissioner [of lncome ][Tax ][' ][(Appeals-ll)' ][Hyderabad']JThe lncome [Tax Officer' ][Ward-5(9)' ][Hyderabad']4One CC [to ][Sri ][A' ][Radha ][Krishna' ][Senior Standing Counsel ][for ][lncome Tax]loPUCl1.The lncome-Tax [Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench ][' ][B' ][Hyderabad']2.The Commissioner [of lncome ][Tax ][' ][(Appeals-ll)' ][Hyderabad']JThe lncome [Tax Officer' ][Ward-5(9)' ][Hyderabad']4One CC [to ][Sri ][A' ][Radha ][Krishna' ][Senior Standing Counsel ][for ][lncome Tax]loPUCl5. One [to ][V.R ][BADRI' SC FOR ] [TAX 6. One [to ] [CH' ] [KIRAN' ][Advocate ]7. Two [CoPies]6. One [to ] [CH' ] [KIRAN' ][Advocate ]7. Two [CoPies]
kam
?^q,
HIGH COUR''
DATED: 0910il2023
JUDGMENT
lTTA.No.806 rf 2006
ITTA !S DISt\ ISSED
(-S)\:)\:. ,,,.,/i' [/,;]i_-a ---
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.