Itta/82/2000 Of Commissioner Of Incometax v. Sri B. Ramesh
High Court
27 Jun 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/82/2000 Of Commissioner Of Incometax v. Sri B. Ramesh
Date of order
27 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/82/2000 Of Commissioner Of Incometax v. Sri B. Ramesh, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed and theimpugned order of the learned Tribunal is upheld.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
I.T.T.A.Nos.82 of 2000 and 40 of 2001
Date: 27.06.2013
I.T.T.A.Nos.82 of 2000
Between:Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P.-I,Hyderabad.
.....Appellant
AND
B.Ramesh
...Respondent
I.T.T.A.Nos.40 of 2001
Between:Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P.-I,
Hyderabad.
.....Appellant
AND
B.Venkatesam
...Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
I.T.T.A.Nos.82 of 2000 and 40 of 2001
COMMON JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
When these matters are taken up for hearing, it appears thatthe point involved in these matters is covered by the decision of aDivision Bench of this Court in I.T.T.A.Nos.41 of 2000 and batchdated 07.12.2011. The said judgment has been decided in favourof the assessee and against the Revenue. Obviously, theseappeals have to be dismissed.
Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed and theimpugned order of the learned Tribunal is upheld. No order as tocosts.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall also standclosed.
___________________
K.J.
SENGUPTA, CJ
_______________
27.6.2013 Gsn.
G.ROHINI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue