Itta/83/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vincentian Andhra Society
High Court
02 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/83/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vincentian Andhra Society
Date of order
02 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
2007-08, 2006-07, 2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/83/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vincentian Andhra Society, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: ROHINI I.T.T.A.No.83 OF 2012 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta) This appeal is sought to be admitted on thefollowing suggested questions of law: 1) Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correctin law in deleting the donation of R...
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ________________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.No.83 OF 2012
DATED: 2.7.2013
Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax
… Appellant
AndVincentian Andhra Society,Enikepadu,Krishna District.
… Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.No.83 OF 2012
Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta)
This appeal is sought to be admitted on thefollowing suggested questions of law:
1) Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correctin law in deleting the donation of Rs.77,15,000/-donated to a society, viz., Vicentian Society,Mysore, with religious objects ?
2) Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correctin law in deleting the expenditure incurred forreligious purposes, i.e., maintenance of priests,preachers and Seminary maintenance ?
This appeal is preferred against the judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal dated 24.11.2010 in relationto assessment year 2007-08.
We have heard the learned counsel for theappellant and gone through the impugned judgment of the
learned Tribunal.
It appears the learned Tribunal has decided thematter following its earlier judgment for the assessmentyear 2005-06 and also the order of the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2006-07 inassessee’s own case.
There is no statement that the order of the Tribunalin relation to assessment year 2005-06 has beenchallenged or upset. Similar is the situation so far as theorder of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) inrespect of assessment year 2006-07. In suchcircumstances, the issue has reached finality between theparties. Therefore, no question of admitting a non-issuetreating it to be an issue unnecessarily.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
______________________
G. ROHINI,
J 02.07.2013pnb
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.