Itta/87/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Nava Bharat Ventures Limited
High Court
28 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/87/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Nava Bharat Ventures Limited
Date of order
28 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/87/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Nava Bharat Ventures Limited, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Nothing has beenstated whether appeal has been filed against the said decision.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.87 of 2014
DATED:28.2.2014
Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad.And
… Appellant
M/s. Nava Bharat Ventures Ltd.,Hyderabad.
….Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.87 of 2014
Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta)
We have heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for theappellant and we have gone through the impugned judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal.
We do not want to admit this appeal and we dismiss thesame in view of the fact that the learned Tribunal has relied on anearlier decision of the assessee’s own case. Nothing has beenstated whether appeal has been filed against the said decision.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if anypending, shall also stand dismissed. No costs.
__________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.