Itta/87/2016 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax-6, Hyd v. Smt. D. Anitha, Secunderabad
High Court
30 Sep 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/87/2016 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax-6, Hyd v. Smt. D. Anitha, Secunderabad
Date of order
30 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/87/2016 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax-6, Hyd v. Smt. D. Anitha, Secunderabad, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the said statement, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforestated.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE K. LAKSHMAN
I TTA Nos.2 0 2 of 2 0 0 6 ; 2 8 2 an d 2 9 3 of 2 0 0 8 ;2 3 7 , 3 4 9 , 4 7 0 an d 4 9 8 of 2 0 1 2 ; 3 7 3 an d 4 3 4 of 2 0 1 3 ;
5 7 2 of 2 0 1 4 ; 2 4 0 an d 2 4 8 of 2 0 1 5 ;3 1 , 8 7 , 1 5 1 an d 1 6 9 of 2 0 1 6 ;
8 0 , 3 2 4 , 4 7 6 , 6 1 7 , 6 3 4 an d 6 3 7 of 2 0 1 7 ; an d7 3 an d 2 0 4 of 2 0 1 8
COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma, learned senior standing counsel for the appellants-Revenue and Mr. J.V. Prasad, Ms. K. Mamata and Ms. M. Kiranmayee, learned standing counsel for the appellants-Revenue, state that these appeals no longer survive for consideration in view of the fact that the tax/ duty effect is less than the monetary limit fixed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 and Circular No.23 of 2019 dated 06.09.2019. Liberty is however sought by the learned counsel for restoration of the appeals in the event any of the exceptions have application.
Recording the said statement, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforestated. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
September 30, 2019/ DSK
_____________
K. LAKSHMAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.