Itta/88/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax [Central[ v. Smt.t.vengamamba Sneha
High Court
10 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/88/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax [Central[ v. Smt.t.vengamamba Sneha
Date of order
10 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/88/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax [Central[ v. Smt.t.vengamamba Sneha, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant appeal, tax effect is rvell below the ntonetarrlirnit 'fhelefore, 5. the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.202.4.I lowever, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, iL would be open to the In...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH
THURSDAY ,THE rWO TUOUSAND
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE [.IUSTi6-iTNNSING ]
INCOME TAX [ NO:88][ oF ][2016]
lncome [Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260A of ][the ][lncome Tax Act'1961]tn ITA No309/HYD/20'13 [for ][the]agalnst [the ][Order ][dated][ 06.06.2014 ][Passed]the file [of the ][lncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal']Assessment [Year ][2007-2008 ][on]Hyderabad [Bench'A', ][HYderabad']
Between:
THE COMMISSIONER [OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)' HYDERABAD]
.,.APPELLANT
AND
SMT.T.VENGAMAMBA [SNEHA, ][R/o'F ][No ][603' ][Srinidhi ][Towers' ] 6rrrt"t.lsiiNagar [Colony, Hyderabad']
...RESPONDENT
counsel [for the ][Appellaht: ][MS'J'SUNITHA ][( ][JR SC FOR INCOME TAX)]
Counsel [for the ][Respondent: ]
The Court [made the ][following: ]
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAONANDIKONDA
ITTA No.88 oF 2016
JUDGMEN T (pcr I ktn'ble ,\ri ,lustit:c p Satn Koshy)
Hear.d Ms. J. S unitha learned Junior Standing Counsel forthe Income Tar Department for the appellant. perused the record.
This appeal under Secrion 260z\ ol the Incorre ,l.ax Act.
2
196 l, has been preferred by tire Revenue as the appellanlappellanlagainst tlre order dated 06.06.20 14 passed by the tncome faxAppellate l-ribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,Hyderabad,lnHyderabad,lnI.'t.A.No.i09/ll_vd/20 l i fbr the Assessment year 2007_0g.3. Central Board ol- Direcr Taxes (CBDT) has issued CircularNo.9 ol 2024 dated 11.09.2024, amending rhe previous CircularNo.5 of 2024 dared 15.0-1.1024, by further enhancing the monetarylimits fbr r'iling appeals by the Income.fax Deparlment before theIncome ['lax ]Appellate ll.ibunals, High Courts and Supreme Courtas a measurc 1br reducing litigation. [n paragraph 2 of the said2007_0g.3. Central Board ol- Direcr Taxes (CBDT) has issued CircularNo.9 ol 2024 dated 11.09.2024, amending rhe previous CircularNo.5 of 2024 dared 15.0-1.1024, by further enhancing the monetarylimits fbr r'iling appeals by the Income.fax Deparlment before theIncome ['lax ]Appellate ll.ibunals, High Courts and Supreme Courtas a measurc 1br reducing litigation. [n paragraph 2 of the said
Circular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for trting an appeal
belore the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4. In the instant appeal, tax effect is rvell below the ntonetarrlirnit
'fhelefore, 5. the appeal filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.202.4.I lowever, if the appeal comes within the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, iL would be open to the Income Tax Depafinrent toseek revival of the appeal. There shall be no order as to costs
6. Consequently, miscelIaneous petitions pending, if any, shallstand closed
Sd/- B. SATYAVATHIJOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome [Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['A" ][Hyderabad.]
2.oneCCtoNIS.J'SUNITHA(Jr.standingCounselforlncomeTax)[oPUC]
3. One CC to [SRl. N NARASIMHA ] [Advocate ] ]
4. Two CD CoPies
-lPK/psl
Y\'
HIGH COURT
DATED:10104t2025
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.88 of 2016
ITTA IS DISMISSED
G.dqkN
otl [1][ ilc r /4f](:o.,s'-)),.i,21 E{o't -t..\O5s [paTCH]gO
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.