Itta/89/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Hyd v. Coromandal Bio-Tech Industries Ltd., Hyd
High Court
20 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/89/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Hyd v. Coromandal Bio-Tech Industries Ltd., Hyd
Date of order
20 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/89/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - I, Hyd v. Coromandal Bio-Tech Industries Ltd., Hyd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the iiberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT I-IYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTIETH TWO THOUSAND
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL [NO: ][89 ] [2013]
Appeal under Section 260 of [the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act.' ][1961 against ][the ][order]made in LT.A.No. 2B9tHydl20O7, [Dated ][30.03 ][2012 on ][the ][file ][of the ][lncome ][Tax]Appellate Tribunal, Bench ['A" ][Hyderabad, ][for ][the ][Assessment ][Year ][2003-2004,]preferred against the order made in 1.T.A.No.0214lClT(A)-l1105-06 [Dated 20.11.2006]on the file of the Commissioner [of ][lncome ][Tax, ][(Appeals)-ll, Hyderabad ][preferred]against the Order made [in ][PAN/GlR ][No.AJaUACC8B39Q/C-102, ][Dated 28.03.2005 ][on]the file of Assistant Commissioner [of lncome ][Tax ][Circle-1(2), ][Hyderabad.]
Between:The Commissioner Of lncome [Tax - ][l, ][HYD, ][Hyderabad]
...APPELLANT
ANO
Coromandal Bio-Tech [lndustries Ltd., llnd ][Floor, ][Amrutha ][Hills, ][Topaz ][Building]Punjagutta Hyderabad
...RES'.NDENT
Counsel for the Appellant [: SRl. J.V.PRASAD](sR. s.c FoR lNcoME TAX IIEPT)
Counsel for the ResPondent [: ][--]The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE THE CHIET JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO
INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.89 of 2013
JUDGMENT : [(Per ]the Hon'ble th.e Chief Justice Atok Aradhe)
Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income TaxDepartment for the appellant.
2.
Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant seeks
Ieave of this Court to withdraw the appeal in the light of the CircularNo.O9 12024, dated 17.09.2024, with the liberty to revive the same incase the subject matter of the appeal falls in any of the exceptionsprovided in the Circular No.5l2024 dated 15.03.2024.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the iiberty as prayed for.
Miscellaneot.is applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.However, there shall be no order as to costs.However, there shall be no order as to costs.
A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMAJOtNTgEGTSTRAR /
//TRUE COPYII
"l
S,ECTION OFFICER
To,
I IP r. I ne ll::lq ne ll::lq ll::lq [[rax ][Appeltare ]][[Appeltare ]][[rribunat. ]][[Bench ][.A,, ]][[.A,, ]][[Hyderabad,]]r. I ne ll::lq ne ll::lq ll::lq [[rax ][Appeltare ]][[Appeltare ]][[rribunat. ]][[Bench ][.A,, ]][[.A,, ]][[Hyderabad,]]
I IP r. I ne ll::lq ne ll::lq ll::lq [[rax ][Appeltare ]][[Appeltare ]][[rribunat. ]][[Bench ][.A,, ]][[.A,, ]][[Hyderabad,]]uommtssroner of lncome Tax. (Appeals)_ll, Hvderabadr. I ne ll::lq ne ll::lq ll::lq [[rax ][Appeltare ]][[Appeltare ]][[rribunat. ]][[Bench ][.A,, ]][[.A,, ]][[Hyderabad,]]uommtssroner of lncome Tax. (Appeals)_ll, Hvderabad
Hvderabad3. The Assistant commissionu, or tnconl. tnconl. iaii'i,iirl\el, Hyderabad.Hyderabad.3. The Assistant commissionu, or tnconl. tnconl. iaii'i,iirl\el, Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
commissionu, or tnconl. tnconl. iaii'i,iirl\el, Hyderabad.Hyderabad.1. ?,ii BS t"":k [, ][rrasad, ][senior ][stanoin!'cluiriet ][for ][rncome ][rax ][(opuc)]Ks/gho
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011212024
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.89 of 2013
Dismissing the AppealAs withdrawn, Without costs.
01 W
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.