Itta/89/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Virupa Township
High Court
19 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/89/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Virupa Township
Date of order
19 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/89/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Virupa Township, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 89 OF 2016
Appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,againstorders of the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam,in ITANO. 324A/iz/2012, dated 11-12-2013, for A.Y.[2008-09.]
Between:
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vijayawada.
...Appellant / Respondent
AND
M/S. Virupa Township, 23-32-23, A.V. Towers, Paparaju[Street,][ S.N.]Puram, Vijayawada.
...Respondent / Appellant
Counsel for the Appellant :SRI. J V PRASAD (SC FOR [ TAX)]Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. G V N HARI
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010127742016IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRAPRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)PRADESHAT AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3507]
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.89 OF 2016
Between:
The Commissioner Of Income Tax
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s Virupa TownshipCounsel for the Appellant:
...RESPONDENT
1. J V PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.G VN HARIThe Court made the following:
X
To
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
1.The learned counsel for the appellant-Department has[filed]a memo into Court, including a copy of the circular whereby, theappellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy[and][ under]the said policy,it has been resolved not to initiate any appeals orpetitions, where the monetary stakes involved are less[than Rs.2]Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court to withdraw[the]appeal.a memo into Court, including a copy of the circular whereby, theappellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy[and][ under]the said policy,it has been resolved not to initiate any appeals orpetitions, where the monetary stakes involved are less[than Rs.2]Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court to withdraw[the]appeal.
2.Submission is placed on record.
3.Accordingly,the appealis dismissed as withdrawn.No
costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions,if any
pending in this appeal shall stand closed.
SDI- P. VENKATA RAMANA
JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam,
SRI. J V PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX), Advocate
2. One CC to
3. One CC to SRI. G V N HARI Advocate
4. Three CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/11/2024
ORDER
EP52 5 FES 2025»toJ^ . Current Section. ^
ITTA.No.89 of 2016
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN
/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.