Itta/90/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. M/S. Vishwas Investments Pvt. Ltd
High Court
26 Jun 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/90/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. M/S. Vishwas Investments Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
26 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/90/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. M/S. Vishwas Investments Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.No order as to costs. _______________________ Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OFJUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.90 OF 2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-IIIT.T. Towers, A.C. Guards,Masab Tank, Hyderabad.
..... Appellant
AND
M/s. Vishwas Investments Pvt. Ltd.,22-23, Sarvasukhi Society,West Marredpally, Secunderabad.
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
appellant that this matter is covered by a judgment of thiscourt, decided against the Revenue and, therefore, hedoes not want to press this appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.No order as to costs.
_______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
June 26, 2013MAS
__________
G.Rohini, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue