Case Law › High Court › Itta/91/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Itta/91/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. Inter Continental Constructions

High Court 11 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

11 Dec 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/91/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. Inter Continental Constructions, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Followingthe same, we dismiss this appeal also.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No. 91 OF 2004 11-12-2014 BETWEEN Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Visakhapatnam …Appellant And M/s. Inter Continental Constructions, 49-28-5/1, Madhuranagar,Visakhapatnam …..Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No. 91 OF 2004 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is filed against the order, dated 08-04-2003,passed by the Visakhapatnam Bench of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal in ITA No.929/H/1997. It is represented by the learned Senior Standing Counsel forthe appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent that thedepartment filed ITTA No. 287 of 2003 in relation to ITANo.921/H/97 which was disposed of along with ITA No.929/H/1997 challenged in this appeal. Today itself, we dismissed ITTA No.287 of 2003. Followingthe same, we dismiss this appeal also. There shall be no order asto costs. ___________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J 11-12-2014ks ____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.