Itta/95/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. R.venkateswara Rao
High Court
26 Jun 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/95/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. R.venkateswara Rao
Date of order
26 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/95/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. R.venkateswara Rao, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OFJUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.95 OF 2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-IIHyderabad.
..... Appellant
AND
R.Venkateswara Rao
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
Having heard the learned counsel for the appellantand after going through the impugned judgment andorder, we are of the view that no law point is involved in
this appeal. The learned Tribunal has held that thespeculation loss of Rs.14,80,914/- cannot be carriedforward to future assessment years. In view of this finding,we feel nothing wrong on the part of the Tribunal indismissing the appeal filed by the revenue.
Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. No order asto costs.
_______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
June 26, 2013MAS
__________G.Rohini, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.