Itta/95/2016 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Demi Realtors, Hyd

TELANGANAcouRr [.?+ ]H|GH I?#ItrEDoF MONDAY, '''inro riousAND AND TWENTY FlvE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE [P'SAM ] THE HONOURABLE NG RAO NANDIKONDA] 95oF 2016tNcOME TAXTRIBU NAL [A] [NO:] Appeal [filed ][under Section ][260-A ][of the ][lncome'tax ][Act' ][1961' against]the order [of ][the ][lncome-tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad' ][Bench ]['A"]Hyderabad [in ][M.A'No'125 ][lHydlz(.1l ][in ][ITA'No'649/Hyd/2013' ][dated ][28'01'2015]for the [year ][2008-09 ][(served ][on ][1E'02'2015) ][preferred against ][the ][orcier ][of ][the]commissioner [of ][rncome ][Tax ][(Appears)Jr, ][Hyderabadr ][in ][lrA.No'O1.2/DGlr]cc-6/Clr(A)-lll [12012-13, ][dt]/d'02'2f,13' ][in ][PAN'No'AAFFDg4OIP' ][preferred]against [the ][order ][passed ][by the ][Dy' ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax' ][Central]Circib [-e, ][Hyderabad, ][dt'29'12'2oo9'] Between: THE PR.COMMISSIONER [TAX' ][HYD' Hyderabad] ...APPELLANT(S) AND M/S. DEMI [REALTORS, ][HYD' ][8-3-167/8/133/30'1' ][P.IPJ:No' ][133 Flat ][No ][302']"r'iig''i' k;tyan Nagar' Hvderabad'Lalitha [Nilavam ][npa'tments'3a]L""" ] ...RESPONDENTS Counsel [for the ][Appellant: ][SRI' J ] [PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)] Counsel [for the Respondents: ] The Court [made ][the ][following: ] tt THE HONOURABLE [P.SAM ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE [SRT.IUSTTCE ] NANDIKONDA TTT [No.95 ] [2016] JUDGMENT[(per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][P'Sam Koshy)] Heard Ms. [B.Sapna ][Reddy, ][leamed ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel representing [Mr' ][J'V'Prasad' ][leamed ][Senior ][Standing]Counsel for the [Income ][Tax ][Department ][for ][the ][appellant ][and]Mr. A.V.Raghu Ram, [leamed'counsel ][lor ][the ][respondent' ][Perused]the record. 2Considering [the ][submissions made ][by the ][leamed ][counsel]on either side insofar [as ][the ][subsequent ][developments ][that ][have]transpired pursuant to [the ][impugned ][order ][passed]1nM.A.No.125lHyd/204 [dated]1nI.T.A.No.649lHyd/20 13 dated28.01.2015 and the orders [those ]that have been [passed]equently and which are [also ][challenged in ][appeal and ][has ]nowd the High Court [vide ][ITTA.No. ][136 ]of [2024, ]the presentrendered infructuouson either side insofar [as ][the ][subsequent ][developments ][that ][have]transpired pursuant to [the ][impugned ][order ][passed]1nM.A.No.125lHyd/204 [dated]1nI.T.A.No.649lHyd/20 13 dated28.01.2015 and the orders [those ]that have been [passed]equently and which are [also ][challenged in ][appeal and ][has ]nowd the High Court [vide ][ITTA.No. ][136 ]of [2024, ]the presentrendered infructuous \t 3. Accordingty, the [appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as having ][become] infructuous. There [shall ][be ][no order ][as ][to ][costs.] Consequently, [miscellaneous ][petitions pending, ][if ][any, ][shall] To, stand closed. SD/- R. KARTHIKEYANJOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER The Sales Tax Appellate [Tribunal, ][Bench ]- [A' ][Hyderabad.] 1 2The Commissioner of lncme'Tax [(Appeals)-lll' ][Hyderabad] ,The Dy. Commissioner [of lncome Tax, Central Circle-6, Hyderabad'] 4One CC to SRI J V [PRASAD (SC FOR ][INCOME TAX) ][Advocate ][ ]qOne CC to SRl. A [Advocate ] 6Two CD CopiesqOne CC to SRl. A [Advocate ] 6Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:0710412025 ORDER JTTA.No.95 of 2016 DISMISSING THE ITTA I. 1r. -f HE ll t.q,,..i./,'\'-\:-)(f,,U21 rlJE U6tz)oa*/,*-l.4 Ta 'r i.t) I