Itta/97/2001 Of Society For Integrated Dev.in Urbanandr.a v. Comm.of Income Tax Ap.ii Hyd
High Court
21 Nov 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/97/2001 Of Society For Integrated Dev.in Urbanandr.a v. Comm.of Income Tax Ap.ii Hyd
Date of order
21 Nov 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/97/2001 Of Society For Integrated Dev.in Urbanandr.a v. Comm.of Income Tax Ap.ii Hyd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAHANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A. No.97 of 2001
Dated 21.11.2013
Between:
Society for Integrated Development in Urban & RuralAreas, 144/225, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad, rep. byits Secretary, Mrs. T. Nandavardhan
… Appellant.
And:
The Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P. II, Hyderabad,Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.
… Respondent.
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri CKR, J)
This appeal is filed against the order dated 23.05.2001, passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A. No.787/Hyd/2000(Hyderabad ‘B’ bench).
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learnedcounsel for the appellant would submit that in view of the subsequentdevelopments, he has instructions to withdraw the appeal. Hence, heseeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Nocosts. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shallstand dismissed.
____________________
G. CHANDRAIAH, J
Date:21.11.2013.Ssv
____________________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAHAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
Oval: 187
I.T.T.A. No.97 of 2001
DATE: 21.11.2013
SSV
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.