Itta/99/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Hyderabad v. Navabharat Ferro Alloys Ltd
High Court
26 Jun 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/99/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Hyderabad v. Navabharat Ferro Alloys Ltd
Date of order
26 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/99/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Hyderabad v. Navabharat Ferro Alloys Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OFJUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.99 OF 2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-IVHyderabad.
..... Appellant
AND
Navabharat Ferro Alloys Ltd.,Navabharat Chambers,Rajbhavan Road, Hyderabad.
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
We have heard the learned counsel for the appellantand gone through the impugned judgment and order of
the learned Tribunal. We find no mistake on the part of thelearned Tribunal, as the Tribunal has decided this matterfollowing the earlier judgment of the learned Tribunal int h e assessee’s own case in ITA No. 1244/Hyd/2004dated 12.1.2012. We do not find any statement in theappeal to the effect that the aforesaid judgment and orderdated 12.01.2012 has been challenged before any court.Under these circumstances, the judgment had becomefinal.
Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. No order asto costs.
_______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
__________G.Rohini, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.