I.t.t.a v. C.i.t., Reported In 300 Itr251

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A.No.107 of 2012 DATED: 9.7.2013 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,Hyderabad. And … Appellant Andhra Pradesh TourismRespondent… Respondent …RespondentDevelopment Corporation Ltd.,Hyderabad. THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A.No.107 OF 2012 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant andgone through the impugned judgment and order of the learnedTribunal. We do not admit this appeal on any ground as we feel thatthere is no question of law is involved in this appeal. Thelearned Tribunal following the earlier decision of the Tribunalitself dated 20.6.2008 in assessee’s own case, has decided thematter. More over, the learned Tribunal has also relied on thejudgment of the Supreme Court in the case of MalayalaManorama Company Limited vs. C.I.T., reported in 300 ITR251. Hence, we dismiss the appeal. ___________________ _________________ G. ROHINI, J 09.07.2013 pnb