I.t.t.a v. A.p.state Cooperativebank Limited[[1
High Court
15 Nov 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
I.t.t.a v. A.p.state Cooperativebank Limited[[1
Date of order
15 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In I.t.t.a v. A.p.state Cooperativebank Limited[[1, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 2.In the light of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed at the stage of admission.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A.No.485 of 2012
JUDGMENT (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram):
It is fairly stated by Sri S.R.Ashok, learned StandingCounsel for the Income Tax that this appeal by the Revenue underSection 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, preferred against theorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VisakhapatnamBench, Visakhapatnam, in I.T.A.No.396/V/2007, dated 21-11-2007,requires to be rejected in view of the decision of this Court inCommissioner of Income Tax-III Vs. A.P.State CooperativeBank Limited[[1]].
2.In the light of the above submission, the appeal is
dismissed at the stage of admission. No costs.
____________________________
JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
Date:15-11-2012
__________________________________
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
kvr
[1](2011) 200 TXAMAN 200 (AP)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue