I.t.t.a v. Padmavathi Hatcheries (P)Ltd.[[1
High Court
25 Jun 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
I.t.t.a v. Padmavathi Hatcheries (P)Ltd.[[1
Date of order
25 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In I.t.t.a v. Padmavathi Hatcheries (P)Ltd.[[1, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the impugned order ofthe learned Tribunal is set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE MS JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.No.68 of 2000--Date: 25062013
Between:Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P.-II, Hyderabad.
..
Appellant
AND
M/s Kasila Farms (P) LimitedPaigah plaza, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad.
.. Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE MS JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A.No.68 of 2000
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee that the point involved in this matter is covered by thejudgment of a Division Bench of this Court in the case ofCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Padmavathi Hatcheries (P)Ltd.[[1]].
The above judgment has been decided in favour of theRevenue. Obviously, this appeal has to be allowed.
Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the impugned order ofthe learned Tribunal is set aside. There will be no order as tocosts.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shallstand closed.
___________________
K.J.SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 25-06-2013Ksn/Gsn
_______________
G. ROHINI, J
[1](2011) 241 CTR (AP) 171
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue