Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1000/2012 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1000/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. M/S. Sneh Propserty Development Pvt. Ltd

High Court 30 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1000/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. M/S. Sneh Propserty Development Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
30 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1000/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central v. M/S. Sneh Propserty Development Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Even these Appeals are identical, therefore, they are dismissed following our earlier order.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sbw *1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1000 OF 2012WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1001 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)..Appellant -Versus-M/s. Sneh Property Development Pvt. Ltd...Respondent ........... Mr. Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate, i/b. Vipul A. Bajpayee for the Appellant.Mr. Vishnu Hadade for the Respondent. ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATE :- 30[th] OCTOBER, 2014 P.C.: At the hearing of these Appeals, Mr. Vimal Gupta, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Revenue, fairly brought to our notice the orders passed in similar Appeals by a Division Bench of this Court to which one of us (S. C. Dharmadhikari, J.) was a party. In the 5 Appeals which have been dealt with by the Division Bench by its order dated 26[th] September, 2014, the reference is made therein to some more Appeals and of the same Assessee/sister concern, which have already been dismissed. Thus, the penalty levied under section 271D of the Income Tax *2* Act, 1961, was held to be rightly deleted and in the facts and circumstances peculiar to the Assessee. Even these Appeals are identical, therefore, they are dismissed following our earlier order. No costs. (A. A. SAYED, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) wadhwa
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan