Itxa/1007/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B. D. H. Industrie Ltd
High Court
16 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1007/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B. D. H. Industrie Ltd
Date of order
16 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1007/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B. D. H. Industrie Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Issue: Revenue has preferred this appeal on the following questions of law :- (a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal is right in holding that the job work receipts are miscellaneous receipts and thereby not entitled to reduce by 90% from the profits w...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1007 OF 2007
The CIT-Mumbai City-IX Mumbai )..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.B.D.H.Industries Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
appellant.
Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 16.02.2009.
PC
1. Revenue has preferred this appeal on the
following questions of law :-
(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal is right
in holding that the job work receipts are
miscellaneous receipts and thereby not entitled to
reduce by 90% from the profits while computing the
deductions u/s.80-HHC ?
(b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal is correct in deleting the additions of Rs.73,602/- from the total turnover, the same being the value of scrap sold ?
2. In respect of the assessee in Income-tax Appeal
No.1080 of 2008, relying upon the order passed by
this Court in other appeals, we have sent the matter
: 2 :
back to A.O. to recomputation afresh. In so far as
questions-(A) & (B) are concerned, the same are
remanded for reconsideration to the A.O. Appeal
therefore, restored to the file of A.O.
3. Appeal disposed off accordingly.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.