Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1007/2007 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1007/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B. D. H. Industrie Ltd

High Court 16 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1007/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B. D. H. Industrie Ltd
Date of order
16 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/1007/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. B. D. H. Industrie Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Issue: Revenue has preferred this appeal on the following questions of law :- (a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal is right in holding that the job work receipts are miscellaneous receipts and thereby not entitled to reduce by 90% from the profits w...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1007 OF 2007 The CIT-Mumbai City-IX Mumbai )..Appellant V/s. M/s.B.D.H.Industries Ltd., )..Respondents ---- Mr.Suresh Kumar with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 16.02.2009. PC 1. Revenue has preferred this appeal on the following questions of law :- (a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal is right in holding that the job work receipts are miscellaneous receipts and thereby not entitled to reduce by 90% from the profits while computing the deductions u/s.80-HHC ? (b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal is correct in deleting the additions of Rs.73,602/- from the total turnover, the same being the value of scrap sold ? 2. In respect of the assessee in Income-tax Appeal No.1080 of 2008, relying upon the order passed by this Court in other appeals, we have sent the matter : 2 : back to A.O. to recomputation afresh. In so far as questions-(A) & (B) are concerned, the same are remanded for reconsideration to the A.O. Appeal therefore, restored to the file of A.O. 3. Appeal disposed off accordingly. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan